Understanding Incommensurateness: A Concept for Radically Different Perspectives
Incommensurateness is a concept that was introduced by the philosopher and social theorist Gianni Vattimo in the 1990s. It refers to the idea that certain concepts, values, or ways of understanding the world are fundamentally incompatible with one another, and cannot be reconciled or reduced to a common framework.
Incommensurateness is often used to describe situations where two or more perspectives or worldviews are so radically different that they cannot be easily integrated or compromised. For example, the perspective of a religious fundamentalist may be incommensurate with the perspective of a secular humanist, as their beliefs and values are based on fundamentally different assumptions about the nature of reality and the role of human beings in the world.
Incommensurateness can also be used to describe situations where two or more concepts or values are so radically different that they cannot be easily compared or contrasted. For example, the concept of "justice" may be incommensurate with the concept of "freedom," as these two concepts are based on fundamentally different assumptions about the role of the state and the rights of individuals.
Incommensurateness is often seen as a challenge to traditional notions of rationality and dialogue, as it suggests that there are certain perspectives or values that cannot be fully understood or reconciled through reasoned discourse. Instead, incommensurateness highlights the importance of acknowledging and respecting the fundamental differences between different perspectives, even if we cannot fully understand or resolve them.